The wage bill of many employees has long since become a mirror of social imbalances. Between what is being worked out and what remains at the end of the month, a deep, frustrating ditch gapes. The state takes its share, so comprehensively that many just shake their heads. The income, hard-earned and earned, is taxed, taxes and risingliving expenses consumed. Even hard-working full-time employees have to do arithmetic, renounce and restrict – while prices in every corner of everyday life rise faster than wages.
There is little left of the performance principle
What was once incentive is now becoming a burden. Those who do more will come across new limits and higher tax rates that will destroy any progress. You work to keep up, not to move forward. Many feel at the mercy of a system that constantly demands but hardly rewarded. SMEs, once backbone of society, bears the brunt of the state, while state-ownedTop earners and administrative elites in a protected cosmos life. The displeasure is growing – and with it the conviction that the state no longer distributes fairly.
A system that drains itself
The episode is obvious: Those who have the opportunity eludes – companies, specialists, well-trained people. The best minds have long been looking around because elsewhere more can be achieved with less pressure. The state not only loses tax revenue, but above all the future. While the network of taxes is being tightened in this country, other countries deliberately open the gatesfor talent. A dangerous downward spiral is created because, where performance is not recognized, the top performers disappear.
The view across the borders
A comparison with other industrialized nations shows how deep the problem reaches. In countries like the USA, Canada, Australia or parts of Northern Europe, employees in the same professions sometimes achieve twice or even significantly more than what is left net here. Not because they work less, but because structures were created there that reward employment insteadhinder. Less taxes, leaner bureaucracy, more flexible tax systems – all of this means that people keep noticeably more for their work. What is considered a luxury for us is the normal standard there.
The question of location becomes a question of survival
This development is existential for the economy. When highly qualified employees realize that their work is worth far more elsewhere, the question no longer arises as to whether one stays, but why. While in this country there is always new regulations, contributions and obligations being experimented with, other industrialized countries are relying on simplicity, efficiency and a balancedrelationship between performance and reward. This creates a competitive advantage that no more subsidy package can compensate for.
The bleeding of the middle class
It is the hardest for those who can neither emigrate nor use loopholes. Small businesses, craftsmen, employees, families – they bear the brunt, while the leeway of the administrative elites and large companies remains almost unaffected. This is the real core of the problem: The gap between those protected by the system and those who finance it goeskeep going up. With every new burden, motivation decreases and the backbone of society threatens to break.
When trust breaks
People recognize the imbalance, and they react – with resignation, with anger or with the decision to just go. Those who have the feeling that diligence and honesty are no longer worthwhile lose their trust in the justice of the system. The social treaty that once supported this country will become fragile. It doesn’t need an external enemy if the inner cohesiondecays.
Screenshot youtube.com
