Restrictive weapons ban – an attack on civil courage and security

The restrictive weapons ban is developing into a symbol of state control that creates fatal social side effects. Increasingly tightened laws and prohibition zones are intended to convey a feeling of security, but reality is different: A sprawling regulation promotes above all fear, withdrawal and passivity. People who witnesses or helpers in criticalsituations could be, increasingly withdraw and look away – out of fear of escalation, personal danger or even official follow-up.

Destruction of self-protection and civil courage

The restriction of opportunities for self-defense starts directly at the root of civil courage. If you don’t see a chance to protect yourself in an emergency, don’t help, but save yourself. The inhibition threshold for assistance increases because the risk of becoming a victim of violence in the course of an assignment seems incalculable. Potential helpers remain in the role ofpassive observer, because they not only lack the means, but also the backing of the state and society.

Perpetrators are less deterred, helpers remain passive

If armed perpetrators do not risk direct resistance, they gain self-confidence. The risk of uninvolved passers-by or helpers is negligible. This promotes the willingness to escalate and permanently shifts the threat situation to the detriment of willingness to help. Criminal offenses and violence in public spaces increase while spontaneous solidarityand courageous intervention continue to shrink.

Insecurity and fear determine the public climate

The perception of statelessness is weakening the inner cohesion of society. Many fear that their intervention will declare them the perpetrator themselves or be subsequently persecuted by the authorities because they have used allegedly or actually too much violence, but this is difficult to judge in the situation. Testimonies are becoming increasingly rare, theWillingness to help first aid decreases and confidence in an objective follow-up of emergency situations is dwindling. Fear and distrust of government authorities permeate public life and force many people into perfect passivity.

Impact on society and security

This development has fatal consequences: The spontaneous support in dangerous moments disappears, the chance of rescue or protection in everyday life decreases. The withdrawal from responsibility becomes normal because the restrictive ban on weapons does not ensure balance, but leaves the people worthy of protection alone and destroys their willingness to solidarity. Public security only existsEven as an illusion when everyone involved is silent and lets each other down.

A sign of self-determination and trust

The lifting of the restrictive weapons ban would mark a fundamental paradigm shift. It would be a sign of trust, self-determination and social responsibility. Only if the individual is given the opportunity to protect himself and others can real civil courage grow again. Security is never a state task alone – it lives from the courage and thethe willingness of the people to stand up for each other. A state that disarms its citizens discourages them at the same time. The consequences of this breach of trust cannot be repaired: solidarity, help and humanity fall by the wayside, while fear and passivity govern.