The gap between workers and civil servants is no coincidence…

The gap between workers and civil servants is no coincidence, but the result of a system that has long since said goodbye to any idea of fairness. Here two worlds face each other: one bears the full risk, the other collects the privileges. Anyone who works, pays taxes, withstands uncertainty and competition, can watch as a protected state apparatusSelf served first – structurally secure, politically protected, financially pampered. It’s a system that is not only unfair, but also degrading because it mocks the performance of those who keep the store running at all.

earlier to the money pot

This imbalance is particularly shameless when it comes to balancing prices. While private sector workers have to struggle through tough negotiations, war of nerves in collective bargaining rounds and the constant trembling for the location, officials are picked up early and cushioned. There is extensive compensation, while the rest first swallows the inflation. herethe true hierarchy in the state is revealed: Officials are treated like a privileged caste that is first to be secured for breathing, while those who are dependent on the free market have to live with the delay and sometimes without any compensation. This is not a mistake, it is a crystal clear prioritization.

Cheap money for one side, expensive for the other

Contempt for equal treatment when it comes to financing and loans becomes even clearer. Officials will be able to access loans on terms of which ordinary workers can only dream of thanks to special programs and the security of their status, which is considered unshakable. More favorable interest rates, better conditions, generous offers – all because the state demin fact issues a risk exemption. On the other hand, anyone who works in the private sector is already carrying a higher risk by definition and is also punished by banks. More interest, more security, more hurdles. Here is a perfidious game: Some get the red carpet rolled out, others get the bill for a risk that they didn’t choose, but thatimposed on them the system.

Two worlds in old age

The inequality does not end with the last day at work, it only really explodes when it retires. While civil servants with a high proportion of their last salary are retired and thus remain relatively close to their usual standard of living in old age, after decades of contributions, employees are pushed into the role of the supplicant. The statutory pension is only a fractionDepend on what is actually needed for life, and those who are unlucky end up dangerously close to the subsistence level despite a full-time career. Here it becomes unmistakably clear how this society distributes Worth: Proximity to the state is worth gold, market risk is a personal problem. One area gets a planable, lavishly equipped supply, the other a system that is just preventingthat the facade of a supposedly solidary community collapses completely.

Health costs: Shielding for one, hits for the other

The same trace of inequality is also pervasive when it comes to health. Officials benefit from subsidies that cover a significant portion of their healthcare costs and combine them with cheap hedging models. Employees, on the other hand, regularly pay into a system that is becoming more and more expensive and whose contributions they shoulder full. There are also taxes for pensions, care andUnemployment that additionally burdens disposable income. So while one group lives in a padded supply cocoon, the other fights with increasing contributions, increasing uncertainty and the constant fear that savings will be made again in an emergency – not with the privileged, but with those who already have less.

The state increases first for itself

If there are state wage increases somewhere, then it is striking how quickly the political will suddenly exists. Suddenly it’s quick, suddenly there are funds, suddenly the need is undisputed. Officials are regularly among those who first participate in new money, while the rest of the population has long felt the rising prices and is still on therelief awaits. While inflationary flare-ups make everyday life more expensive, the adjustments are much smoother for state employees. This is nothing more than an institutionalized mechanism in which the proximity to the state automatically becomes a head start in accessing fresh money. Those who are close to the source get first, who is far away, can watch their purchasing powermelts away.

Taxes and deductions: Cheap niches for civil servants

This imbalance is joined by tax and legal subtleties, which further increase the distance. Certain allowances are treated more cheaply in the civil service area, professional expenses can often be more generously applied, and the entire legal framework is knitted in such a way that the status of civil servants always brings advantages. Employees, on the other hand, are in a tight gridPressed, pay their taxes without restraint and have to fight their way through complex regulations in order to be minimally relieved at all. What is sold here as a “system” is in fact a finely balanced machine that allows two people with comparable performance and responsibility to be treated completely differently – solely because of their status.

Asset accumulation with handbrake on – or full throttle

Over years and decades, this unequal treatment has added to a wealth gap that is hard to overlook. Officials have a secure job, plannable advances and state-secured care that allows them to plan, invest, build property and take risks in the long term without having to fear a crash. workerOn the other hand, the entrepreneurial, economic and personal risk bears, without receiving a comparable backing. They struggle with uncertain contracts, time limits, industry risks and the constant threat of restructuring. While officials make fortune from a position of security, many workers do little more despite hard work than somehow overto hold water. The fact that structural asset differences result from this is no coincidence, but the logical consequence of political decisions.

A system that cements cleavage

All these factors together result in an image that can hardly be described as systemic preference in any other way. The state treats its own people like a protected elite while leaving those who generate prosperity in the private sector with the risks of an unpredictable world. The financial, social and legal architecture is designed in such a way that theDistance between the two groups does not shrink, but grows. The message is clear: Whoever switches to the protected area saves himself to safety; Those who stay outside remain the toy of the market, crisis and politics. This structural inequality eats up in the social structure, destroys trust and creates a climate in which performance is no longer the decisive factorbe the benchmark, but the right status at the right time. This is exactly the core of injustice: not commitment, not responsibility, not risk, but the proximity to state power.