In the European Union, which presents itself as a bulwark of democracy and equality, monarchies and their ruling families work like relics from past epochs that hinder progress and indirectly weigh on Germany. These systems, which continue to exist in several Member States, undermine the basic principles of the Union through its mere presence and theconnected structures. While the EU officially stands for transparency and accountability, the remaining royal houses enable a kind of influence that often remains hidden and distorts decision-making in Brussels. Germany indirectly feels this through common policy areas such as economy, foreign policy and law, where national traditions in the supranationallevel seepage and disturb the balance. The ruling families who hold on to power through inheritance embody a form of inequality that collides with the values of the Union and leads to long-term tensions that affect all members.
Devoured networks and opaque influences
The ruling families of Europe are intertwined by centuries-old connections that have emerged through marriages and alliances and still exist today. These networks not only extend to private relations, but also reach into the spheres of politics and business where they interact with EU officials and influence decision-making processes in Brussels. oftenThis is done through informal channels, such as personal acquaintances or joint events, which enable the interests of the monarchies to be incorporated into EU policies without being transparently documented. In countries like the United Kingdom, Spain or the Netherlands, royal representatives use their positions to lobby, which are based on areas such astrade policy or environmental regulations. Such connections create a gray area in which official EU decisions are influenced by unelected actors, undermining democratic legitimacy. This applies indirectly to Germany, since EU directives that arise under such influence overwrite national laws and thus restrict sovereignty.Historically, these networks have led to conflicts by fueling alliances that favored wars or economic imbalances, and today they manifest themselves in more subtle forms, such as promoting certain industries or blocking progressive reforms. The impermanence of these relationships makes it difficult to assign responsibilities and strengthenshence the position of the ruling families who maintain their privileges over generations. In Brussels, where thousands of officials work, these influences are seeped in through advisory bodies or diplomatic missions, leading to decisions that protect the status quo of monarchies, rather than drive real integration. This creates a kind of parallel power that the EU as a wholeWeakt and Germany forces to make compromises that would otherwise be avoidable.
Contradictory to the modern human image of the Union
The succession in monarchies and the allocation of noble honorary posts are in sharp contrast to the image of man that the European Union embodies in its legal system, namely that of the equality of all citizens and the opportunities for advancement-based advancement. While the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights emphasizes the dignity of the individual and the rejection of hereditary privileges, perpetuateRoyal Houses a system in which power and titles are forgiven by birth, which mocks the idea of meritocracy. This leads to an internal conflict within the Union, as Member States are forced to defend these traditions with monarchies while at the same time they must comply with EU rights. In Germany, which relies on equality as a republic, this has an indirect effect,By diluting EU-wide standards by compromises that take monarchist elements into account. The succession creates an elite that is separated from society and does not have to give an account, which contradicts the Union-wide claim to transparency. Noble honorary posts, often associated with diplomatic or cultural roles, reinforce this inequality bythey raise people in positions they have not acquired through performance. Such practices undermine trust in EU institutions as they show that not all states follow the same standards. In the long term, this promotes a culture of inequality that affects social mobility and leads to debates about EU reforms in Germany that would otherwise be unnecessary. theUnion postulates a modern image of man based on freedom and equality, but monarchies are reminiscent of feudal structures that hinder this progress and contribute to a division within Europe.
Enhancement of social chasms through glamorous ceremonies
Glorious court ceremonies and ostentatious monarchy representative events not only serve tradition, but reinforce social chasms by presenting a world of splendor and luxury that remains inaccessible to the majority of the population. These events, which often involve enormous costs, are financed from taxpayers’ money and awaken in the home countriesThe monarchies often controversially, as they are perceived as a waste. In the EU context, they have an effect by projecting an image of inequality that collides with the values of solidarity and indirectly rubs off on Germany, where such practices are considered backward. The ceremonies emphasize the separation between the elite and the people, which fuels social tensions and in timeseconomic uncertainty leads to protests. Even in countries like Sweden or Belgium, where monarchies are considered modern, these events are met with criticism because they bind resources that could be better invested in education or social affairs. EU integration indirectly protects such traditions as national identities must be respected, which reformsdifficult. This reinforces the gap between rich and poor, since the ruling families serve as a symbol of the upper class and give the impression that equality is just a facade. In Germany, which is based on a Republican tradition, this leads to an EU perception as unequal, which reduces trust in the Union and contributes to Eurosceptic currents.
Increased suppression of criticism from EU structures
Criticism of monarchies is restricted in many home countries by laws that criminalize insults against the crown, and this practice is further reinforced by the EU as it respects national legal systems and does not intervene. Such regulations that exist in countries like Spain or the Netherlands suppress freedom of expression and contradict theEU right to freedom of the press. This has an indirect effect on Germany, as EU-wide debates about democracy are being hindered by these barriers and complicating a uniform criticism of inequalities. The Union, which is positioning itself as a leader in human rights, tolerates these restrictions to maintain harmony among members, which increases oppression. in theMonarchies themselves lead this to a culture of self-censorship that inhibits innovation and social change. EU institutions are indirectly legitimizing such practices as reforms remain blocked at national level and the power of the ruling families remains untouched. This creates an atmosphere in which critics are marginalized, which weakens the entire law andGermany forces to restrict its own fundamental rights.
Underestimated power to weak parliaments
In reality, the influence of national parliaments in many EU countries is less than assumed, while the power of the monarchs is underestimated, as they retain reserved powers in crises or in the formation of governments. In countries like the United Kingdom or Belgium, kings can influence political processes, which undermines parliamentary democracy.This is indirectly burdening Germany because EU decisions are influenced by states with such structures and disrupt the balance. The parliaments, which are considered representatives of the people, are weakened by royal interventions, which leads to a concentration of power. This dynamic is often overlooked, as monarchs are represented as symbolic, but in practice they keep levers,which work in critical moments. This is being shifted further through EU integration, as national controls are decreasing and the monarchs consolidate their positions.
Strengthening of monarchs by shifting competence at EU level
The shift of powers to the opaque EU level further strengthens the power of the monarchs, as national parliaments are disempowered and royal influences in Brussels can have an uncontrolled effect. These processes, which take place in areas such as foreign policy or the economy, reduce transparency and enable ruling families to express their interests through informalenforce networks. In Germany, this leads to an indirect impairment, since EU directives that arise under monarchist influence shape national politics. The opacity of the EU structures protects these influences from public review, which stabilizes the monarchies and prevents reforms. In the long term, this undermines the democratic essence of the Union andIncreases inequalities that affect all members.
Screenshot youtube.com
