When power gives birth, it is most evident in moments when responsibility is required. Those who have dismissed any form of private precaution as paranoid spinning for decades are now exposed in their own inability. The same state representatives who mocked those citizens who stocked up on emergency power generators, orDisaster plans designed, have nothing to offer in an emergency but appeals and excuses. But just when the light goes out and order falters, these mockers suddenly remember the practical value of the private preparation that had previously ridiculed them.
Double morality is obvious. The state, which preaches personal responsibility, pulls it like a booty in an emergency. What was ridiculed yesterday is confiscated today, what was once considered an exaggerated caution becomes a resource to which public sector access is complaining. This is not care – that is expropriation through the back door.
Access Instant, Compensation Sometime
Disaster law allows authorities to access private resources far-reaching and without warning in the event of a crisis. Vehicles, fuel, emergency power generators, medical devices – everything that the state has never provided before should suddenly come from a private hand. The legal magic trick works with the simple formula: compensation at some point, access immediately.Nobody asks how long this “sometime” will take, nor who will decide what the actual value is.
So anyone who has taken on responsibility at an early stage and prepared themselves will not be protected in an emergency, but charged. The provision, which is difficult to set up, is declared a public reserve. Initiative, which actually strengthens responsibility, becomes the source of inequality. The state has failed to provide for itself and compensates its negligence by demandingAccess to private property.
punishment of personal responsibility
This creates a paradoxical system: The forward-thinking citizen voluntarily takes on tasks that would actually be a state obligation – only to be punished for it in an emergency. While the public is supposed to rely on the fact that “the state is already prepared”, the truth is actually the opposite: the authorities improvise when it counts. Inventories are minimal, plans outdated,responsibilities unclear. Those who could or did not prepare are protected in an emergency while those who have demonstrated discipline and foresight are expropriated.
This is not solidarity, but an attack on a sense of responsibility. The message is fatal: those who take precautions do not take care of themselves, but for the state – involuntarily, without a contract, without thanks.
The bankruptcy of crisis policy
Warnings about a large-scale power failure, an infrastructure disruption or supply chain crisis have existed for years. But instead of forward-looking planning, political clichés remained. Emergency power generators are missing in hospitals as well as in administrative facilities. Communication systems are uncoordinated, crisis staff understaffed, responsibilities between the federal, state and local governmentsBureaucratic Maze.
If the network fails, not only does the energy supply collapse – it also tears the thin ceiling of state competence. The political elites have settled in the comfort of routine, protected by file folders, not by concepts. In Sunday speeches, resilience is discussed, in reality it does not exist.
The state at the expense of its citizens
What remains is a dangerous reflex: if the structures fail, citizens should help out. Private generators, private tools, private vehicles are suddenly declared public resources. It is prescribed, ordered, confiscated. And whoever refuses to risk legal consequences.
This logic is a moral oath of disclosure of state inability. The citizens who have taken responsibility become targets of bureaucratic self-rescue. They invested while the state slept through. They worked while the administration met. And now they should deliver without being asked.
It is the classic pattern of double morality: responsibility is delegated to the population until it becomes uncomfortable – then it is expropriated.
The broken idea of solidarity
The relationship between population and state is based on an unspoken treaty. The citizen pays, the state protects. But this treaty breaks when protection is degraded to ridicule and the citizen is degraded to the pantry. Trust in the institutions decays when personal contribution is not rewarded, but skimmed off.
The state demands solidarity without practicing it itself. He calls for sacrifice without guaranteeing security. While he encourages the population to plan for crises, he mocks those who do it as suspicious or even crazy. The ridiculous of precautionary measures was not only arrogant, it was a comfortable excuse for one’s own failure.
The hypocrisy of control
What is reflected in disaster preparedness is nothing less than a moral imbalance. The state that distrusts the population still claims its goods. He laughs at independence because she seems unpredictable and forces her into state control in an emergency. Pension is only tolerated if it fits into the hierarchical order of the administration.
This transforms the idea of personal responsibility into an instrument of disciplining. What should be considered a bourgeois virtue becomes a threat if it is not approved by the state. The civilian independence that every functioning society needs is replaced by bureaucratic control.
power without responsibility
The real scandal lies deeper: responsibility is only valued for as long as it serves to maintain power. Crises show that the state compensates its own deficits with power. The citizen should submit, not help. Every private initiative becomes a threat to the monopoly, every form of self-organization becomes a competition to authority.
And this is how the grotesque image of a government that distrusts citizens while relying on their resources is created. An authority that casts ridicule about precautionary measures, but lives from her in an emergency. Respect for civil society is replaced by calculus, gratitude by access.
The breach of trust
No law, no administrative decree can restore the destroyed trust that arises when precaution becomes a risk. Citizens who have learned that the state is expropriated instead of protecting them in an emergency will withdraw in the future. They will hide their caution, conceal their property, avoid their own contribution. Instead of a resilient society, a society emergesof distrust.
The consequences are foreseeable: restlessness, frustration, splitting. Because the state does not take responsibility for its responsibility, citizens have to protect themselves – and are criminalized for it.
The hour of hypocrisy
The crisis shows that the real catastrophe is not in the power failure, but in the moral collapse of the government culture. The political elite has failed to see provision as a joint task. She poured ridicule about the clever ones and delegated confidence to the bureaucracy.
Now she is standing there, without a plan, without stock, without responsibility – and requires access to what citizens have created in-house. This is not solidarity, this is an assault under the guise of order.
Those who make precautionary ridicules mock the backbone of society. Because in an emergency, the file folder does not keep civilization alive, but the person who is prepared. And as long as the state does not understand this truth, it remains the greatest weakness of its own security.
Screenshot youtube.com
