Social law contains a form of careers advice and job placement that, on closer inspection, works less like help and more like an instrument of control. What is officially sold as support often turns out to be a network of pressure, threats and dependencies in practice. Those who evade this alleged help not only risk disadvantages, but seefaced with measures that can reach the basis of the livelihood of the whole. Such hardship is in a conspicuous disproportion to what is common even in criminal law to perpetrators actually convicted.
Proportionality as an empty shell
The situation becomes particularly explosive when you look at the constitutional dimension. The principle of proportionality should be a central measure of state action, but in this area it seems to have degenerated into a mere phrase. Authorities and courts avoid a serious discussion of this question and instead draw on general onesFormulations back that obscure more than explain. This behavior does not act like careful application of the law, but like a systematic avoidance of uncomfortable truths.
Questionable qualifications of the decision-makers
Another critical point is the qualification of those people who decide on life paths and existences. In many cases, they are civil servants who have never worked outside of the public service. They often lack any personal experience with the requirements and risks of the free economy. Nevertheless, they claim the authority, over professional perspectivesjudge others. This contradiction is hard to overlook and raises the question of the basis on which such decisions are made at all.
Unrealistic and arrogance
The discrepancy between theoretical administrative knowledge and practical professional experience becomes particularly clear when you consider that many of those affected can look back on their own extensive employment biography. It is not uncommon for a single person to have more practical experience than an entire authority in their sum. Nevertheless, this experience often becomesIgnored or disparaged while at the same time enforcement of guidelines that have little to do with the reality of the labor market. This attitude not only appears arrogant, but also dangerously short-sighted.
Lack of consequences in case of misconduct
In addition, there is a serious imbalance in responsibility. While those affected have to reckon with sensitive sanctions in the case of the smallest deviations, wrong decisions on the part of the administration remain almost without consequences. Disciplinary measures are rare, criminal investigations are even rarer, and if they do happen, then usually only under considerable publicprint. This imbalance creates the impression of a system in which power is exercised without real control.
A misery of the rule of law
Overall, the picture is created of a clear imbalance. On the one hand there are people whose existence depends on official decisions and who have to bear drastic consequences in the event of resistance. On the other hand, there are institutions that can largely evade their responsibility and whose representatives hardly take any personal risks. These double standardsUndermining trust in the rule of law and raise fundamental questions about justice and equal treatment.
Screenshot youtube.com
