The Great Lie of the Solid State – Government Debt, Taxes and Great Self Deception

The relationship between national debt and taxes has become a monumental self-deception that makes citizens believe that there is actually a financial house of cards. The widespread assumption that taxes would finance government duties directly and fully has become a reassurance pill, which is simultaneous with a public swearing a public who has long suspected that thenumber world doesn’t match. The state presents itself as a responsible householder, while at the same time it digs deeper into debt and postpones the actual costs until tomorrow. From the citizens’ point of view, this is nothing more than a double deception: You pay well today, while it was long decided that tomorrow would have to be re-cashed because theDebt clock does not stand still.

Special assets as trivialized debt

The so-called special assets are the most perfidious instrument in this game, because they act as if they were reserves or provisions, while in reality they are nothing more than hidden debt packages. With beautiful terms and technical language, the impression is given that clever, separate money pots are formed here, although it is simply a matter of expenditure on credit that oneoutsourced from the normal household to make it look clean. This cosmetic operation obscures the real burden that builds up over years and decades and has to be borne by taxpayers who have never been asked. Those who relabel debt into assets are engaged in linguistic fraud acrobatics, which only serves to account for the political responsibility for seriousto hide wrong decisions.

government projects on credit

Many state projects are in fact pre-financed with expensive loans, while the public is reassured with the fairy tale, and taxes would regulate everything. New programs, rescue packages, prestige projects and big political promises are paid from a cash register that is not full at all, but is filled with borrowed money. The regular interest payments arepermanent burden, which wraps itself around every future household like a clamp and pulls the air off for real design. While new roads, schools or social projects can be canceled or postponed indefinitely, interest rates are untouchable, they have to be served, no matter how society is doing. The state bows to its creditors, not to its citizens.

Interest before education, infrastructure and people

The priorities have long been perverted: The operation of interest rates is firmly on the agenda, while investments in education, infrastructure and social services become a bargaining measure. If the household gets tight, new projects are first cut, bridges are not renovated, schools are left for a while, nursing staff is comforted, while interest rates flow on time and full. With that, thestate a clear message: The anonymous investors are more important than children in classrooms than commuters on dilapidated streets, than old people who depend on support. The burden of debt becomes a moral declaration of bankruptcy, in which the common good is no longer the benchmark, but only the calm of the financial markets.

Politics in the retching of the creditors

The growing dependence on lenders massively restricts political action, because the legitimacy of government action is increasingly being measured by whether the markets have trust, not whether measures are actually useful to citizens. Government statements are increasingly sounding like reports to investors in which signal words and credit phrases are more important than concrete onesImprovements in people’s everyday lives. Anyone who rebels against this logic and reminds of the common good is quickly considered naive, dangerous or irresponsible because it disturbs peace with the donors. This puts democracy from the head to the feet: Citizens are no longer the decisive audience, but those who benefit from making debt.

Blocked reforms through official self-defense

In-depth reforms in state structures would be urgently needed to reduce spending, reduce double structures and finally streamline inefficient apparatuses, but these reforms are nip in the bud. Government stakeholders defend their responsibilities such as principalities, bureaucratic resistance build walls against any change, and every idea is being talked up for so long,until only a diluted residue remains. The administration protects itself, not the taxpayer, and thus prevents exactly the modernization that would be necessary to get by with less debt and actually turn taxes into visible benefits. Thus, a state that manages itself more and more lavishly, while the promises to the outside world sound increasingly hollow.

Taxpayer as a permanent bogus system of a defective system

Citizens pay taxes in the expectation that roads will be built, schools rehabilitated, security forces will be paid and social systems stabilized. Instead, a significant proportion of the income flows into the service of contaminated sites, debt towers and interest chains, the creation of which they have never decided on. The official narrative, taxes would serve the current tasks directly,covers up that an ever-increasing share is only used to conceal the consequences of earlier political comfort and waste. Taxpayers are becoming permanent guarantors of a system that indulges more and more debts while it tells people that unfortunately you have to save. This disproportion eats up any idea of fairness.

Unfair distribution of the loads

The long-term nature of the debt policy ensures that the burdens are distributed unequally: Today, policymakers benefit from generous programs and apparent ability to act, tomorrow other generations will pay with higher taxes and limited leeway. People experience how they bleed today for a system that will charge even more money tomorrow becauseThe debt clock continues and the interest chains do not break. What is particularly perfidious is that those who are now paying cannot be sure that the promised services will still exist in the future, because every new need to save is first made in public services. This is how you feel cheated: You pay for a promise that has long been pledged.

Incorrect security through household illusions

Official budget plans suggest order, control and responsibility, while behind the scenes, creative constructions, shadow households and special assets are being worked on to disguise debt reality. The public gets glossy graphics and calming formulations, but the real dynamic is a ticking time bomb in the background. the ideaEverything is under control because a few key figures are formally observed is dangerous because it prevents the honestly necessary discussion about priorities, renunciation and real reform. This artificial security is nothing more than a calming drug that only puts the moment of confrontation with reality out.

Loss of trust in fiscal responsibility

All of this leads to a deep loss of trust in the fiscal responsibility of the state, because it is becoming increasingly clear that short-term political relief is more important than long-term stability. Citizens see how special programs are set up, new debts are legitimized, levies are adjusted and taxes are creatively distributed without correcting the fundamental imbalances. theThe question of whether the system is fair overall is necessary when one recognizes that some benefit from subsidies, rescues and support programs, while others primarily support the interest burden. The confidence that taxes are used sensibly and justly erodes the more it becomes clear that they are increasingly serving the administration of an ever-increasing debt burden.

Systemic injustice as a permanent scandal

In the end, a system remains behind in which taxes are officially sold as a solidarity contribution to community financing, while in fact a significant part is only used to plug well-known holes and keep the interest machine running. People experience new debts being resolved faster than real savings that make special assets easier toCreating are to be reduced as superfluous structures, that interest payments are untouchable, while social benefits are always up for grabs. This interaction nurtures a deep sense of injustice, which makes any political communication about responsibility seem hollow. Those who deal with taxes and debts not only destroys figures, but also the moral basisof the whole system.