The imbalance of the tax burden and the silence of the scholars

The social debate about justice and the distribution of burdens is often accompanied by remarkable blindness of the academic elite. While public welfare reforms are being discussed in public, there is a striking silence in the schools about their own privileges. This condition leads to massive distortion of perception and blocksNecessary changes in the structure of social security. A fundamental reorganization is required to end the selective burden on the working center and to make the system of social security sustainable.

The blockade of scientific progress

The scientific examination of the social injustices of our community remains incomplete as long as one’s own privileges are excluded. Critical reflection on special rights for civil servants hardly takes place in the academic company. This is simply because the university staff themselves enjoy this special position or have this statusaims. friend Television scholars regularly and loudly comment on the grievances in our society. However, one’s own privileges are concealed or only addressed with the greatest reluctance.

The need for dynamic research structures

There is no factual justification for the officials of the teaching staff at universities. The resulting non-cancellability even inhibits scientific progress when teachers are no longer up to date or their fields of expertise are becoming less important. Dismissals from this rigid corset would bring the necessary dynamics to research. At the same time wouldThis opening up massively advance the debate as a whole about the abolition of outdated privileges.

The one-sided load of the working center

In this day and age, known proverbs hit the core of social reality particularly hard. Those who are in regular employment bear the brunt of financial obligations. The self-employed, civil servants and elected officials largely evade this crushing responsibility. The huge expenses of the welfare state are almost exclusively dependent on theemployees financed through their social security contributions. Since the founding of the republic, this tax burden has only known the direction steeply upwards.

The historical shift in the limits of stress

In the post-war period, when dynamic old-age security was introduced, the total social security contributions only formed comparatively small parts of the income. Today, this post consumes almost the entire share of gross earnings. In parallel with this enormous increase in social security contributions, the tax rates in our country were continuously reduced. Until lateIn the eighties, top earners had to cede more than most of their growth to the tax authorities. In the period that followed, however, this maximum rate was massively reduced.

The disadvantage of middle-income

These opposing developments primarily affect employees with low and medium incomes. This group of people in particular is below the upper limit for social security contributions and feels the constant increases immediately. At the same time, they hardly benefit from the tax cuts, since they only pay small tax amounts anyway. Benefit from the reductions in tax ratesOn the other hand, the higher earners are disproportionately.

The creeping erosion of purchasing power

This imbalance in the structure has caused the gradual disadvantages of the working center to high earners and the privileged groups in recent decades. People with average earnings today hardly have any financial leeway for private life. In this way, the human working factor is becoming more and more expensive and unattractive, which is theadditional economic dynamics slows down. Complete exemption from these overwhelming social security contributions is the sole possible way out of this misery.

First steps to relieve low incomes

Small steps in this direction have already been taken by only flat-rate and no full social security contributions for marginal employment. Transition areas were also created for income in the lower middle area, in which the tax burden is only gradually increasing. When the defined earnings limits are reached, the full rates are due. The goalThese measures are to get a grip on fundamental problems of the existing system.

The paradox of the design limits

The core problem is that low and normal earners are now significantly more burdened by social security contributions than taxes. For top earners, on the other hand, social security contributions are becoming increasingly important in relation to the higher incomes. This degression leads to massive injustices, as the performance of the lower and middle layersis completely ignored. The previous system of tax deductibility of pension expenses exacerbates this effect even further.

The unjust effect of tax deductibility

Currently, contributions to social security within certain maximum limits can be deducted from the assessment basis for income tax. This mechanism means that high-income earners can also achieve higher tax savings through their higher tax rate. On the other hand, those who earn so little that no or only small taxes are incurred do not benefit at all from this regulation.Top earners whose total charges are almost the largest part of the income are reimbursed from their social security contributions from the state.

The way to a fair overall order

It is urgently necessary to eliminate several unjust states at the same time and to fundamentally renew the system. The selective financing of the welfare state by the dependent employees must finally stop. Likewise, the unjust treatment of higher earners, which is disproportionately relieved by tax progression, must be ended. merelyFull decoupling of social security contributions from the human labor factor can bring the desired relief.

The overall social dimension of the tax reform

If one looks at these profound injustices from a higher perspective, the structure that systematically bleeds out the performers of society, while other groups evade their responsibility, is revealed. The refusal of the academic elite to question one’s own privileges is only a symptom of far greater problems of socialself-block. True social justice cannot be achieved through isolated interventions, but requires the courage to hold all types of income and status groups accountable. Only if the burdens of social security are distributed fairly and in a fair manner can trust in the cohesion of society and the country’s economic future viabilitybe secured.